Dold: Tax Hikes Not Off the Table
Congressman says he's open-minded about debt reduction.
Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth) indicated he would not automatically reject any deficit reduction program that includes a tax increase after giving a legislative update to more than 45 people Monday at Highland Park Rotary Club meeting at the Highland Park Country Club.
“I don’t want to put it off the table,” Dold said, adding he preferred not to raise tax rates. “It’s not the right thing to do in the face of this down economy."
Bipartisanship necessary for debt reduction
During the meeting, Dold took questions on topics including the country’s financial condition, the burgeoning national debt, job creation and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The issue of a revenue component to cut the federal deficit was raised by three different attendees. One man asked if a bipartisan solution to cutting an additional $1.5 trillion was possible with the new 12-member super committee charged with the task.
“We need seven votes in favor to go back to the House and Senate for an up or down vote,” Dold said. “I am hopeful we can come up with a bipartisan plan to pass and reduce the debt. The only way to get it done is in a bipartisan manner.”
The super committee comprises three House Republicans, three House Democrats, three Senate Republicans and three Senate Democrats. At least one member must side with the other party for success.
“How is that possible with the Grover Norquist pledge?” asked Penny Fields. “I have a problem with pledges. They limit you.”
The pledge by Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform, attempts to get members of Congress and candidates for the office to oppose tax increases.
“I signed it early on as a candidate in the campaign,” Dold said. “I did sign the pledge, but my first pledge is to the people of the 10th District and the nation."
Closing the loopholes
North Shore Sanitary District President and 10th District Democratic Committeeman Dan Pierce, who also attended Monday's event, was critical of signing any pledge.
“It makes it much harder to compromise,” he said. Pierce also served as mayor of Highland Park and a member of the Illinois General Assembly.
Attendee Larry Block was skeptical about reducing the deficit without finding more revenue. Dold responded that he wants tax reform that lowers the corporate tax rate and closes ambiguities in the current Internal Revenue Code.
“What we need to be doing is closing the number of loopholes,” Dold said. “The federal government should not be picking the winners. We need to lower the corporate rates so we’re more globally competitive.”
Dold thinks the best way to increase revenue is to create jobs to reduce the unemployment rate. He believes that rate is much higher than the government-published 9.1 percent.
“The number one issue is jobs and the economy,” Dold said. “Among recent college graduates [the unemployment rate] is 25 percent. When you look at the people who are working part-time or have stopped looking it is closer to 17.5 percent. We need to get them working and paying taxes.”
Eliminating uncertainty
Eliminating uncertainty in the business community and among consumers is the best way to foster job growth, according to Dold. He believes an environment of certainty will give employers the confidence to hire more people instead of hiring temporary workers or making existing employees work overtime.
“There are so many regulations businesses owners do not know what to expect,” Dold said. “They don’t understand how much the new health care law will cost."
Dold believes that making regulations clear for the business community, particularly small business, will make it easier for them to hire.
“We have 29 million small businesses in this country,” Dold said. “We need to create an environment where they can afford to hire just one more person.”
Bob Blinick
10:47 am on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
He signed the Norquist pledge...in order to be elected (gain the Republican support needed to run in the first place). But his "first obligation is to the people of the Tenth District." Which means that he wants to be re-elected. All of which means he will say and do whatever is necessary to be elected, whether it's catering to moneyed interests (need those contributions) or appear pro-choice (need those votes).
kurt swanson
2:26 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
go ahead raises taxes mr. dold you will be a one time freshman congressman.
daniel zube
12:34 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
DON'T TRUST ANYONE THAT GIVES AWAY HIS OPINION TO A PLEDGE, HIS FREEDOM TO MAKE JUDGEMENTS FOR THE GOOD OF HIS CONSTITUIENTS IS IN JEAPORDY. VOTE HIM OUT OF CONGRESS.
Stephanie Brent
1:36 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
You are so right! Politicians who want to work for the welfare of their constituents don't take party pledges. Commitment to party pledges is for zealots and fanatics not representatives.
Dan Jenks
2:07 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
I'm glad that Dold hasn't taken "revenue enhancements" off the table - we need more politicians (unlike the Republican Presidential candidates at the recent Iowa Straw Poll) who are willing to take 4/5 of a loaf if we are going to get out the mess our Country and State are in.
Pledges like "I won't touch Social Security ever" or "I won't ever raise taxes ever" work for 2 reasons. First, people are frustrated that politicians don't ever seem to be accountable for their decisions - forcing them to sign something in writing leads to accountability and highlights policy differences between candidates. Second, we, as an electorate, don't want to spend the time to educate ourselves about these issues - it is easier to look for black and white statements rather than trying to understand some of the more nuanced, complicated aspects of these problems.
kurt swanson
2:28 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
feel free to write a check to the IRS anytime you think you are under taxed :)
Dan Jenks
10:30 am on Wednesday, August 17, 2011
The federal govt spends 25% of our GNP and collects 18% of our GNP in taxes. I don't think the gap can be completely narrowed to an acceptable deficit percentage ("a percentage that enables our Debt/GNP ratio to be flat") without some additional collections.
That said, we also need concurrent and dramatic spending reform - we need to cut defense (rethinking our obligations around the world), means test entitlements (like social security and medicare), start zero-based budgeting, immediately enact Bowles-Simpson, etc.......we are living beyond our means......
Bob Blinick
5:28 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
I think that people are willing to pay taxes if they know that others are paying their fair share, and that the money is going to a good cause. It's a fallacious argument to say to someone to write a check to the government. One problem is the disconnect that so many people feel between the taxes they pay, the taxes others don't, and the services provided.
Jack
10:37 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Exactly right. Nobody is complaining about being under taxed. They realize that making ends meet involves spending cuts and tax increases, so they're willing to pay their fair share as long as everyone else has to as well.
Ken Robertson
1:53 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011
"nobody is complaning about being under-taxed" - actually, I believe Warren Buffett did just that the other day.
Bringin' Down Briarwood
6:12 pm on Wednesday, August 17, 2011
So let me get this straight. Dold has no problem considering "revenue enhancement" (my quotes, not his).
Yet he has told the Tribune, "One item that is very important for what we're doing is right now is lowering the corporate tax rate."
So where would the money come from?
Let the smackdown of the middle class continue!!
That's all this relatively-new resident needed to hear.
kurt swanson
10:40 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011
I do not want my taxes raised so they can spend more. I agree with Dan Jenks
kurt swanson
10:42 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011
I feel that comment was set up so our President can say "See Buffet thinks he under taxed". Write the check Warren and shut up.
Bob Blinick
11:06 am on Thursday, August 18, 2011
Warren Buffet has a reputation for being the toady of Barack Obama. Or, perhaps, he understands that the wealthiest Americans have benefited greatly from the opportunities, freedom, and security available in the US, and now that we are in debt, are the logical source to ensure our fiscal security. I applaud Mr. Buffet for saying what needs to be said, with the credibility to go with it (he is both wealthy and has no political aims).
Jon Hall
12:50 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011
This man is creepy sneaky.
RB
4:45 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011
Dold does not to be as much of a nut case as some of the others who signed that pledge, he did sign though. Walsh signed too. It makes no sense to me why he would sign such a pledge if he honestly wanted to do what is best for his District. He signed it to get elected and now is having to deal with the inflexibility of such a decision. Unless he comes out and clearly denounces the pledge and says it was a 'rookie' mistake....hard to believe a word he says.