Dold Calls for 'Big, Bold Plan' on Debt Ceiling

Congressman calls on President to lay out specific proposal.

challenged to disclose his debt limit plan after a speech to the North Suburban Chamber of Commerce in Northbrook on Monday.

Congress and the President have been negotiating for weeks to arrive at a solution that will allow the federal government to borrow additional funds to meet its obligations in return for reductions in federal spending and the overall debt. 

“I favor a big, bold plan,” Dold told more than 100 Chamber of Commerce members from Northbrook, Buffalo Grove, Deerfield, Wilmette, Winnetka, Highland Park, Glenview and Wheeling. “Nothing can be done without broad bipartisan support.”

To read more about what some locals think about the debt ceiling debate in Washington .  

Though Dold and the President favor a large, long-range plan to reduce the federal debt, Dold wants to see what Obama has in mind. 

“There’s only one guy who can sign it into law,” Dold said of the President. “We have yet to see what it (the President’s plan) is. Will it include $3 trillion in tax increases? We need to see some specifics.” 

also wants to see a large deal along the lines of the recommendations made by Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. The panel was chaired by former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-WY) and Erskine Bowles, former President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff. 

"Senator Kirk supports the bipartisan approach of the President's Debt Commission and the work of the Gang of Five to prevent an American default,” Kirk spokesman Lance Trover said. “He believes that the proposed plan for $4.5 trillion in deficit reduction is the best way to reassure markets and bring spending in line with tax revenues." 

Though Dold did not specifically endorse all the provisions of the Simpson-Bowles proposal, he embraces parts of it.

“It’s the kind of thing we need,” he said.

'A cancer eating us from within'

During his talk to the Chamber of Commerce, Dold specifically cited Bowles’ statement, calling the debt “a cancer eating us from within.” 

One specific piece of legislation introduced in the House of Representatives Monday morning to allow an increase in the debt ceiling has been dubbed “cut, cap and balance.” The proposed legislation would cut $1.8 trillion from non-defense discretionary spending over 10 years and mandate a two-thirds majority by the House and Senate for future tax increases. 

Dold likes the concept but has not taken a firm position. He left the Chamber of Commerce meeting to catch a plane to Washington where he would have time to study the proposal in detail. 

is happy with neither the theory nor the details of the proposed law. She believes the Republican House majority is using its leverage to potentially damage America’s credit rating. 

“The Cut, Cap, and Balance bill would enact spending cuts that would cost 700,000 Americans their jobs, and would lay the groundwork for devastating cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid,” Schakowsky said. 

'No chance'

Schakowsky explained the United States Chamber of Commerce and other business leaders have warned the government not to risk default. “I will oppose this bill, which has no chance of becoming law,” she said. 

As a freshman member of Congress, Dold recognizes his limitations to influence Congressional leaders, but plans to play a role nevertheless. 

“I can talk to the people who are in the room,” Dold said referring to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA). “I can let them know what people are saying here, what impact it is having on people here."

The federal debt ceiling was on the minds of many people in the room Monday, including Brent Hamachek of Northbrook. He wants Dold to take a hard line and force Obama to make major changes before he's allowed to borrow more money for the country. 

“Given all of the pressures the Republicans in the House are bringing right now, how steeled is the group to stand and fight in the debt ceiling debate,” Hamachek said. “Out here, Atlas is starting to shrug.” 

Dold made it clear the country will pay its bills. He likens the country to the “best business in the world” and the national debt as an obligation that must be honored. 

“How are we going to restructure that business so it is not going to take on the debt it has?” Dold asked. “What we want going forward are cuts significantly greater than the debt ceiling will be raised.”

chris larsen July 21, 2011 at 11:42 AM
So he favors a big bold plan. Sounds decisive, sort of. He embraces parts of the Simpson-Bowles proposal, like what? The picture of Dold on this page has that bewildered, used and abused look that W had. So let's raise the debt ceiling and in exchange lower $1.8 trillion in discretionary spending. How about a mandatory re-lowering after x amount of time and progress? How about giving details about what those programs are that are being cut? All of this is just happening in a bubble, I fear that journalism these days just does the talking points bidding of the powerful, what about extracting full information out of these people, albeit a difficult task. I think Dold and the rest of them should have to disclose the top 10 campaign contributors and in addition what corporate Boards those people sit on, preferably patches on their clothes like Nascar, then we can get a picture of who wants to cut what programs for what reasons, ie, who they represent. What I think is a big bold plan is to vote for Ron Paul who wants to strip away all of the props in the theatre, pull back the curtain, make everything transparent and simplified again, and start over with the constitution. That is the only way this country will survive with pride ever again. Until then we'll all be fed the same old filtered sound bytes that originate from the 1% of the people in this country. God Bless America, the People need it right now.
chris larsen July 21, 2011 at 12:16 PM
And by the way, the economy, the credit rating, individual rights compared to corporations, and small business will all continue to deteriorate per the strategy of these 1% as they don't have tight allegiance to just our country and they will swallow up the money regardless. This is all just theater. Again, "big, bold" changes needed go far beyond what is being ambiguously talked about here.
Sully July 21, 2011 at 01:17 PM
I can't say I agree with everything Paul stands for, and he would probably not receive my vote, but much of what you say, Chris, holds true. Both major parties are so beholden to corporate cash that nothing else matters. Corporatocracy at its best.
Sully July 21, 2011 at 01:19 PM
And the mainstream media is part of the corporatocracy, so you'll never get anything truly accurate from the press.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »